Skip to content
Home / Fonts / FontFont / FF Elementa Rough
FF Elementa Rough

FF Elementa® Rough

by FontFont
Individual Styles from $47.99
Complete family of 2 fonts: $79.99
FF Elementa Rough Font Family was designed by Mindaugas Strockis and published by FontFont. FF Elementa Rough contains 2 styles and family package options.

More about this family
FREE 30-DAY TRIAL of Monotype Fonts to get FF Elementa Rough plus over 150,000 fonts. Start free trial
Start free trial

About FF Elementa Rough Font Family


Lithuanian type designer Mindaugas Strockis created this display FontFont in 2002. The family contains 2 weights: Regular and Bold and is ideally suited for advertising and packaging, film and tv as well as software and gaming. FF Elementa Rough provides advanced typographical support with features such as alternate characters, case-sensitive forms, and stylistic alternates. It comes with tabular lining figures. This FontFont is a member of the FF Elementa super family, which also includes FF Elementa.

Designers: Mindaugas Strockis

Publisher: FontFont

Foundry: FontFont

Design Owner: FontFont

MyFonts debut: Nov 29, 2011

FF Elementa® Rough is a trademark of Monotype GmbH registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and may be registered in certain other jurisdictions. FF is a trademark of Monotype GmbH registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and may be registered in certain other jurisdictions.

About FontFont

Based in the trendy district of Kreuzberg in Berlin, Germany, FontFont was established in 1990 when FontShop founder Erik Spiekermann and fellow type designer Neville Brody wanted to build a foundry where type was made for designers, by designers; a place where type designers were given a fair and friendly offer and where true type magic was made. “From the very beginning,” representatives of the foundry say, “we wanted to bend the rules and test typographic boundaries, to build a library with a collection like no other; a range of typefaces that had different styles, different purposes, that was contemporary, experimental, unorthodox, and radical.”

Read more

Read less